According to Farside Investors, the weekly net flow for US-listed Bitcoin ETFs totaled negative $131.6 million, highlighting a bearish sentiment among institutional investors. Notably, IBIT saw inflows of $81.1 million, while FBTC faced significant outflows of $167.7 million and GBTC lost $40.6 million. Smaller ETFs like BITB and HODL recorded modest inflows at $13 million and $19.7 million respectively. This persistent net outflow may signal caution for traders, indicating potential downward pressure on Bitcoin prices and increased market volatility as ETF activity remains an influential short-term driver for crypto price action (Source: Farside Investors, June 7, 2025).

According to Farside Investors (@FarsideUK), Bitcoin ETF funds recorded a total net outflow of $47.8 million on June 6, 2025, with IBIT experiencing the largest individual outflow at $130.5 million. Other major ETFs, including FBTC and BITB, posted inflows of $22.8 million and $31.8 million respectively. This net outflow signals reduced institutional demand for Bitcoin exposure via ETFs, potentially leading to short-term bearish sentiment in the crypto market. Active traders should note that such outflows can increase volatility and downward price pressure on Bitcoin, especially as IBIT's sizable outflow offsets gains from other funds. These flow patterns are crucial for short-term trading strategies and risk management in the current market environment (source: Farside Investors, 2025-06-07).

According to Lookonchain, on May 30, 2025, the combined net outflow from 10 Bitcoin ETFs reached 1,977 BTC, equating to $208.78 million. Notably, Fidelity led the outflows with 1,571 BTC ($165.09 million), reducing its total holdings to 198,291 BTC ($20.95 billion). Meanwhile, Ethereum ETFs demonstrated a strong net inflow of 37,685 ETH ($97.45 million), with BlackRock iShares accounting for a significant 19,069 ETH ($49.31 million) inflow. These ETF movements signal shifting institutional sentiment: traders should monitor for potential Bitcoin price pressure due to selling and possible Ethereum strength fueled by new inflows. Trading strategies may need to adjust risk and allocation in response to these ETF-driven market flows. (Source: Lookonchain on Twitter)